PLP's Resources Library is an online database holding PLP's guides, conference papers, published research and reports, recorded presentations, policy responses, and many other items.  You can search the items by clicking a category or a tag on the left, or using the search function.  Please note the content from conferences, such as papers and audio, are provided for public law practitioners. Public law is a very fast-moving area and some of the information will be out of date or overtaken by events. PLP accept no responsibility for the contents of these items.



Resources tagged with "Legal aid"

  • photo for Pre-Permission Costs: Reducing the risk of non-payment

    Pre-Permission Costs: Reducing the risk of non-payment

    August 14 2014 | Conference papers | By Karen Ashton and Anne McMurdie

    This paper and related presentation examines the anticipated impact of the new regulations which remove entitlement to payment by legal aid for costs in judicial review where either the case ends prior to permission being granted or permission is refused.

  • photo for Obtaining exceptional funding under LASPO - is it worth applying?

    Obtaining exceptional funding under LASPO - is it worth applying?

    August 14 2014 | Conference papers | By Carol Storer and Tom Royston

    Exceptional funding will only be available to people whose human rights or European Union rights

    would be breached if they did not have legal aid. The Government intends this to be a high threshold and envisages that only a small number of cases will get exceptional funding. This paper and workshop notes examines when your case may be eligible for exceptional funding, and what you need to show to obtain it.

  • photo for Guide to Strategic Litigation

    Guide to Strategic Litigation

    January 13 2014 | Guides | By The Public Law Project

    This guide has been produced to provide individuals and community groups with information to promote a better understanding of how to challenge decisions of public bodies. It is intended for non-lawyers, for community and voluntary sector groups and for individuals. It is not intended for litigants in person (ie those who go to court without a lawyer to assist them), and in no way replaces the need for expert legal advice. Instead, it is designed to help non-lawyers understand the judicial review process, to navigate their way through it, and to get the best out of the lawyers they will undoubtedly need.

  • photo for Ombudsman v JR

    Ombudsman v JR

    July 17 2013 | Conference papers | By Sarah Clarke

    With legal aid for JR under threat, practitioners may want to consider alternatives. Ombudsman decisions themselves are amenable to JR. Representations to the Ombudsman are free, claimants don’t need a lawyer - and in a landscape in which the government appears only to be prepared to fund legal advice for itself, that’s of increasing significance.
    Although there are some disadvantages to using the Ombudsman, there are also advantages, both are considered in this paper.